Christian Colonialism: the culture of the Borg

As reported in the Huffington Post:

According to (Sarah) Palin, the recent backlash against the National Day of Prayer is proof that some people are trying to enact a “fundamental transformation of America” and to “revisit and rewrite history” in order to shift the Christian nation away from its spiritual roots.

Palins’s advice: “Go back to what our founders and our founding documents meant — they’re quite clear — that we would create law based on the God of the bible and the ten commandments.

“What in hell scares people about talking about America’s foundation of faith?” Palin continued. “It is that world view that involves some people being afraid of being able to discuss our foundation, being able to discuss God in the public square, that’s the only thing I can attribute it to.” – the Huffington Post

Funny choice of words.  I mean, she hits the nail squarely on her own head – because it is really conservative Neo-Evangelicals like herself who are afraid of taking a fresh look at our country’s foundation. When they encounter new (or suppressed) information about old events, information that tends to bust patriotic and religious myths, they ridicule it as revisionist history. Of course, revisionist does not mean wrong. It’s usually the other way around.

In “Guns, Germs and Steel”, Jared Diamond argues effectively that it was not moral or intellectual superiority that allowed Western civilization to advance technologically while others didn’t: it was merely an accident of geographical fate. Our  more ‘advanced’ culture had access to plants and animals that were easily domesticated (like wheat and horses) that other people in other places did not. This led to an early Eurasian agricultural system that could support a class society that included not only rulers, scribes and scholars and explorers but also a professional warrior caste. The Aztecs, Incas and Mayans had developed many of these same things: they were empires as well.  But, because of their native geography and it’s relative lack of natural resources, their technology was quite a few centuries behind Eurasia.

When the Europeans met the Native Americans they came equipped with cavalry, steel armor, swords, cannon and a thirst for empire.  Even very small bands of armed European soldiers could decimate Native American armies hundreds of times their size, which is what happened at Cajamarca.  Factor in European diseases and plagues introduced to the New World, diseases that killed millions of native people, and the outcome was inevitable.

One line in the book reminded me that our European forefathers were more like the Borg of Star Trek than the founders of the “Christian Nation” who live on in the imaginations of people like Sarah Palin:

“The initial success of Pizarro and Cortes did attract native allies. However, many of them would not have become allies if they had not already been persuaded, by earlier devastating successes of unassisted Spaniards, that resistance was futile and that they should side with the likely winners.”

Resistance was futile. “Assimilate or die”could be another way of saying “that they should side with the likely winners”.  Almost makes me wonder if the Star Trek writers were thinking about Western civilization when they conjured up the Borg.  And of course, it was not just the Spanish, but the French, Dutch, Portugese, English and Americans who helped conquer the New World by enjoying the same imbalance of power.

But, am I just guilty extremist thinking here? Isn’t this all just liberal exaggeration? Well, let’s consider all those native cultures and nations that have been able to coexist peacefully with Christian (Catholic and Protestant) European colonists and their descendants.  Funny, I can’t seem to think of any. They either no longer exist or were assumed into the Western collective.

Perhaps it is a bit outlandish to compare the human colonialists with the terrifying and monsterish Borg. But try looking at the Europeans from the perspective of a Native American. Or Fiji islander. Or a Bantu farmer. I think the ships, horses, armor and weaponry used by the colonizers might be just as terrifying. And the soldiers just as monsterish.  But at least they were Christian.


, , , , , , , , ,

  1. #1 by logiopath on May 13, 2010 - 4:37 pm

    Ahh Sarah–She has cashed in on her brief “run” at VP, has she not?

    This Neo-Falwellian message has yielded her big $$$$$.

    Just goes to show it don’t take brains below the puffy coif (sorry Chris) to have more than her 15 minutes of fame.

    BTW–Who was the running mates of Humphrey? My point is that we’ve come so far from sense that political losers seem to have found a way to gain from what would have once been considered an embarrassing defeat.

    Funny how the instant pop culture has turned failed political hacks (not that Sarah is necessarily a hack) into multi-millionaire authors/cultural icons.

    • #2 by rey on May 16, 2010 - 12:52 am

      You would think after she just flat quit her job as governor of Alaska that people would see she’s just in politics for the money and realize she has no real principles. I mean seriously, if you are in it for principle, wouldn’t you stick it out and “fight for the little guys”?

      • #3 by Christian Beyer on May 16, 2010 - 9:13 am

        I’m not very concerned about her motivations in politics. She may very well be sincere and good intentioned. She might believe that the Tea Party idea is ‘fighting for the little guys’. I’m more concerned about the (in)accuracy of her remarks and the trouble that remarks like that cause.

        Though I have heard that she has made a whopping amount of money since she got on the national political gravy train. But then, which national politician hasn’t?

  2. #4 by rey on May 16, 2010 - 12:31 am

    Why does everyone think the founders were Christians when they were Deists? Just the mention of the word “God” doesn’t make someone a Christian.

    • #5 by Christian Beyer on May 16, 2010 - 9:09 am

      Exactly. In fact, the founders went to great lengths to insure that Christianity did not take any precedence over other faiths. And some, such as Thomas Paine were atheists.

  3. #6 by rey on May 16, 2010 - 12:50 am

    Obviously my comment refers to the writing of the Constitution, not to conquering the land.

  4. #7 by logiopath on May 16, 2010 - 2:51 pm

    She may say she is fighting for the “little guy,” but come-on; she resigned her post as Guv of Alaska to become a rubber-chicken circuit icon. She is simply cashing in on her loss.

    Makes me wonder which embarrassing fact she new about John McCain landed her on the ticket in 2008.

    • #8 by Christian on May 16, 2010 - 3:47 pm

      Yeah. When they announced her candicy I couldn’t believe it. Who? The only thing goofier would’ve been that mayor of New Orleans. The Republicans have got to stop bowing to the Christian Right or they are going to go the way of the Church: irrelevancy.

  5. #9 by logiopath on May 16, 2010 - 2:52 pm

    that’s knew

  6. #10 by logiopath on May 18, 2010 - 4:00 pm

    It also appears Sarah isn’t the only one with $$$$$ in her eyes. Daughter Bristol, late of the campaign trail, will now command $10,000-$30,000 for personal appearances, speech included.

  7. #11 by anon on May 20, 2010 - 12:25 am

    some may feel that the cure for an “us vs them” mindset is to grow in compassion—because when you begin to develop compassion for others, it becomes difficult to see them as the “evil other”.
    Evangalicals might want to look at Matthew 5:46-47
    “If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? and if you greet only your brothers, what are you doing more than others? Do not even the Pagans do that? Be perfect therefore as your heavenly father is perfect.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: