The Pelagian Hearsay

That’s right. I meant hearsay, not heresy.

Occasionally, in conversations with conservative Christians, I have been accused of embracing the Pelagian Heresy.  I  gave these claims little thought, not having known much about Pelagius or his teachings.  (There are so many ‘heretics’  in church history it’s hard to keep track.)  Besides, the other heretic I kept being linked to was Arminius, and I rather liked what he had to say.

Now I realize that these people were probably right.  I am a Pelagian at heart.  I have been reading a book called “Christ of the Celts” by J Phillip Newell and in it he talks a bit about Pelagius, who was a Celt himself.  Rather than being incorporated in the burgeoning Christian empire that was based in Rome, the Celts were pushed out to the fringes and by the fouth century were mostly contained in what is now Scotland and Ireland.  They embraced Christianity but were afforded some insulation from the empire-supporting church doctrines which have shaped the majority of western Christianity.  This Celtic Christianity is much more in tune with nature, much less overburdened with doctrines and dogmas and has a reputation that is, in my opinion, much more in in accord with the true teachings of Jesus. Their theology relies heavily upon the thinking of Pelagius, who was a monk and a mystic that understood the underrated role that nature plays when encountering God.

This is what the conservative Christian Apologetics Research Ministry has to say about Pelagianism:

Pelagianism derives its name from Pelagius who lived in the 5th century A.D. and was a teacher in Rome, though he was British by birth. It is a heresy dealing with the nature of man. Pelagius, whose family name was Morgan, taught that people had the ability to fulfill the commands of God by exercising the freedom of human will apart from the grace of God. In other words, a person’s free will is totally capable of choosing God and/or to do good or bad without the aid of Divine intervention. Pelagianism teaches that man’s nature is basically good. Thus it denies original sin, the doctrine that we have inherited a sinful nature from Adam. He said that Adam only hurt himself when he fell and all of his descendents were not affected by Adam’s sin. Pelagius taught that a person is born with the same purity and moral abilities as Adam was when he was first made by God. He taught that people can choose God by the exercise of their free will and rational thought. God’s grace, then, is merely an aid to help individuals come to Him.

Which sounds pretty reasonable to me. Not having to rationalize ponderous and often inexplicable church doctrines allows the believer to focus more on the authentic Good News of Jesus Christ. Of course, freedom of thought and expression are not things that popes, bishops, kings and governments are fond of, therefore Pelagius’  ideas have been  smeared by both the Roman Catholic and Protestant churches. The convoluted machinations of his theological adversary, Augustine of Hippo, were much more conducive to authoritarian Church control of the peasantry, and consequently Augustine is called a saint and Pelagius a heretic.

Again, according to CARM:

Pelagius has been condemned by many councils throughout church history including the following:

* Councils of Carthage (412, 416 and 418 )
* Council of Ephesus (431)
* The Council of Orange (529)
* Council of Trent (1546) Roman Catholic
* 2nd Helvetic (1561/66) 8-9. (Swiss-German Reformed)
* Augsburg Confession (1530) Art. 9, 18 (Lutheran)
* Gallican Confession (1559) Art. 10 (French Reformed)
* Belgic Confession (1561) Art. 15 (Lowlands, French/Dutch/German Reformed)
* The Anglican Articles (1571), 9. (English)
* Canons of Dort (1618-9), 3/4.2 (Dutch/German/French Reformed)
(CARM).

It’s nice to see that the Catholics and Protestants do agree on some things, as the above list shows.  Some  church leaders have even gone so far as to claim that nothing authored by Pelagius is in existence, requiring that we make up our minds about him through the writings of his adversaries. (The winners always get to write history.) One of the common accusations pointed at Pelagius was that he denied the saving grace of God. Yet on that subject, Pelagius had this to say:

“I anathematize the man who either thinks or says that the grace of God, whereby Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners,’ is not necessary not only for ever hour and for every moment, but also for every act of our lives: and those who endeavor to disannul it deserve everlasting punishment.”

Not too radical.

Fortunately, some of his works survive. His dissertation on Nature presents a concise summation of his theology and is well worth checking out. It’s a shame that the Church has done it’s best to deny its lay members the opportunity to hear from Pelagius and other daring thinkers.

If you would like to learn more about the Pelagian “Heresy” you can check out the links to these pages that attempt to refute  Pelagian theology.  You may find their criticism are not strong enough to convincingly condemn Pelagius and why it required the strength of empire to squash him.  Don’t rely upon hearsay, decide for yourself.

The Pelagian Heresy

The Catholic Encyclopedia

Advertisements

, , ,

  1. #1 by logiopsychoambrosiaivorytowerpath on February 16, 2009 - 9:25 pm

    Oh, how you bait me!

  2. #2 by logiopsychoambrosiaivorytowerpath on February 16, 2009 - 9:28 pm

    Okay–so we’re born with a free-will. Big fa-hairy-deal.

  3. #3 by Christian Beyer on February 17, 2009 - 12:46 am

    Yes, it is. So you have no excuse. Can’t blame it on the Devil anymore.

  4. #4 by BruceA on February 17, 2009 - 2:37 am

    Besides, the other heretic I kept being linked to was Arminius, and I rather liked what he had to say.

    Who is calling Arminius a heretic?

  5. #5 by Christian Beyer on February 17, 2009 - 7:34 am

    Ah, a couple of Calvinists that I talk to.

  6. #6 by logiopsychopathivorytowerdweller on February 17, 2009 - 10:14 am

    Actually, in my reading, some call Arminians semi-Peligians. In fact, I think the Free-Will crowd asserts that origninal sin isn’t the problem, but the posession of the will to sin–as in Paul’s dilemma of Romans 7.

    It seems the Pentecostals I’ve known refuse to see things as being solved in a one-time deal–but I’m not sure of their views of human nature at the time of one’s birth–whether we inherit Adam’s sin, or simply Adam’s will, which is tied to a sin-nature.

    Wasn’t Pelegius good friends with Augustine? Didn’t they play golf and have drinks every Wednesday?

  7. #7 by PFC Beyer on March 12, 2009 - 9:53 pm

    I like Pelegius ;).

    • #8 by Christian Beyer on March 12, 2009 - 10:01 pm

      Me too. Probably should’ve listened to you a long time ago. No – not probably – definitely.

      Pelagius is big with the Celtic Christians, which I realize now that I am one of ;). They were able to avoid so much of the Roman empirical crap that has distorted the church while holding onto a deep and mystical bond with nature.

      Glad to see you here. Keep coming- you’ve got so much to share with us – so much to offer = from a unique perspective.

      Congratulations on your exam. Hoo- rah!

  8. #9 by Sean on March 21, 2010 - 4:44 pm

    I know this is a year old, and you may have researched into it a little more… but Calvinists have it all backward, their leader was a heretic(and an unrepentant murderer), influenced by Augustine, and Augustine was a former Manichean Gnostic–who brought his beliefs into the church and propagated them as church doctrine. Augustine then created his great councils, who denounced Pelagius without Pelagius even being there to defend himself, yet there were two prior councils where Pelagius defended himself and was found to be a sound teacher by the church… of course as you say, the winners write history–and history makes record of them difficult to find, I will keep searching.

    If one would just take the time to study what the Gnostics believed, and then compare it with the beliefs spread around today by Calvinists and Augustine—the connection would be sure-fire. Gnostic beliefs are everywhere due to the Augustine/Pelagius controversy… and Augustine was also the first to announce the killing of heretics(find that in the NT scriptures!)… Jesus was your Lord… Augustine?

    God bless

  1. On Pelagius « Moderate Christian Blogroll

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: