
That’s right. It has been reported that Jesus of Nazareth, at a wedding in Cana, did knowingly and willfully provide alcoholic beverages to children UNDER THE AGE OF 21!!!!
As reported by the Jerusalem Examiner:
It was alleged that the bride herself was only around 13 or 14 years of age, and although the groom sported a full beard he wasn’t a day over 18. This did not deter Jesus and his mother Mary (listed as an accomplice) from providing double the amount of wine intended for the feast, which some say was a deliberate intent to encourage ‘binge’ drinking.
The Palestine chapter of MADD is asking that Jesus be brought up on charges but it is believed that the local Roman magistrate will dismiss the complaint as being a tad hysterical. No evidence can be found that Jesus actually purchased any wine near the time of the wedding.
Last week a 17 year old Judean boy was injured when his camel tossed him into the side of a date palm just two blocks from the site of the wedding. Centurions on the scene suspected that he had been drinking and he was given a breath test. Failing this (the camel fainted), he was ordered to gargle with lemon juice, vinegar and mint. His wife and four children suffered only minor injuries.
The instances of wine induced camel and donkey accidents among young people in the region around Jerusalem is said to be on the rise. New legislation is in the works to make it illegal for camels and donkeys to consume alcohol.
Seriously though. Recently a large group of university deans and presidents have asked that the legal drinking age be lowered, under the assumption that this will help reduce alcohol abuse on campus. Their arguments actually make a lot of sense.
But the only argument I need is this one: if you are old enough to get married, old enough to vote and old enough to die for your country then you are old enough to drink. I know 50 year olds who shouldn’t be allowed near a bottle of Bud – age does not always equate with maturity or the lack there of.
Europe, where they have cast aside much of the Puritanical baggage we are saddled with, doesn’t have this problem with teen alcohol abuse. They never made alcohol into a forbidden and hence, very attractive, taboo. Their coming of age parties are not hinged on getting ‘wasted’ because to the European kid it’s just another…food.
Anyway, Jesus did not seem to have a problem sharing a glass of wine with some young people. Not that it makes any difference to me. I was more than happy to allow my 19 year old daughter to enjoy a Mike’s Hard Lemonade or two on our family beach picnic the other day. Quite civilized, I would say, if not quite legal.










Where in the world do you get these pictures Chris? Too funny.
Oh and yeah, good post. I was just talking about this. I agree.
By: Stephanie on August 21, 2008
at 11:42 pm
I agree with you here. Age has nothing to do with it. Culture and environment speak a lot louder. I didn’t read through all the arguments for hanging the age, but I am not sure changing the age will help to hinder abuse on the college environment, but it most definitely will not add to it.
By: brent(inWorship) on August 22, 2008
at 12:35 am
Yeah, my nephew, a very upright, hardworking, proud and moral young man has had two incidents with alcohol abuse while away for his first year in college, ending up in the ER once. Being underage was irrelevant. His parents were VERY strict about the law concerning alcohol- he was never permitted to have a beer.
I contrast this with my two kids. At meals, if we were having wine or beer then it was also offered to them, just as it is done in Europe. 99 times out of a hundred they had no interest – YECH! But we showed them that beer and wine and even other alcoholic drinks were a pleasant addition to life and intended to be enjoyed in moderation – just like the mashed potatoes on the table. Neither one of them have had any problems to date not that they won’t – one never knows – but you can either attempt to shelter them from ‘evils’ or introduce them to worldly customs in a mature way that will nip any ‘evil’ in the bud. Buddy touched on this with his post on taking his son to concerts.
Imagine being told that you must have Pepsi with your Brats or lemonade with your pasta Putanesca because you are ‘only’ 18 (or 16 or even 12)
By: Christian Beyer on August 22, 2008
at 6:41 am
Oh, and Brent. “Nice” avatar. Is that your pinkie being thrust so delicately into the air?
By: Christian Beyer on August 22, 2008
at 6:47 am
Steph, Buddy O sent me that picture as a comment on my post about the Black Jesus. I just added the beer.
When are going to write something new on your site?
By: Christian Beyer on August 22, 2008
at 6:53 am
Sheesh. What’s next? Come ‘on, Chris. You Lamn Diberals! Always lowering moral standards.
How about an on campus pub at YIT?
By: Ambrosia de Milano on August 22, 2008
at 6:56 am
Actually you will find that Libertarians, not liberals, are the most vocal voice calling for the elimination of drug and alcohol prohibitions, but more and more conservatives are jumping on it. Unfortunately it is considered political suicide to even suggest an open debate on the topic thanks to extremists like MADD.
I hate to say this, sorry if it upsets anyone out there, but the zealots at MADD have all the qualities we associate with petty fascists. The only ones who might be more strident are the anti-tobacco fanatics. I can’t wait until the smoke haters take on Alcoholics Anonymous.
By: Christian Beyer on August 22, 2008
at 8:36 am
I have to argue there… the La Leche League takes the cake… They are the pro-breastfeeding Nazis….
By: BuddyO on August 22, 2008
at 9:11 am
WOW Christian, you missed the main point of another one! Your consistency is admirable……
By: Dan on August 22, 2008
at 9:30 am
I don’t care how militant they get – I’m not doin’ it!
By: Christian Beyer on August 22, 2008
at 9:32 am
Dan, using the story of the wedding feast was an attempt at satirizing those who would like to impose their moral views on the rest of us. I don’t really think that Jesus was out to create a drunken orgy, just as I don’t think that everyone who is opposed to prohibitions is out to encourage irresponsible behavior.
I’ve got to applaud you on your consistency as well.
By: Christian Beyer on August 22, 2008
at 9:35 am
Chris-
I will be writing something new within the year….I think.
Sometimes it just seems more fun to come hang out on your friends blogs. You aren’t nicely telling me to go away are you? LOL
Your posts here are making me ponder a lot more than I would have imagined, so I’m certain I will be talking about something new very soon.
By: Stephanie on August 22, 2008
at 11:43 am
Heck no, Steph. I love it when you come by. Anyway…within a YEAR! C’mon now.
By: Christian Beyer on August 22, 2008
at 12:33 pm
Dan (the man) said:
Does that mean secondary and tertiary points have no value? Or should we just hammer home the same ‘main points’ that we learned in Sunday School over and over again?
By: BuddyO on August 22, 2008
at 12:51 pm
Ever try decaf Dan? Maybe a Latte?
By: BuddyO on August 22, 2008
at 12:52 pm
Buddy is most definitely going to hell…or whatever equivalent we are discussing, for taking his son to a concert
And yes, that is my pinky. I am proud of it.
By: brent(inWorship) on August 22, 2008
at 1:41 pm
You know what they say about the size of a man’s pinky. I wouldn’t be too proud.
By: Christian Beyer on August 22, 2008
at 1:58 pm
I have fake pinkies. Prior to making that decision, men were always jealous of me. I thought the new ones would be best…
By: brent(inWorship) on August 22, 2008
at 2:14 pm
Hell?? no my wife was already there… she took my daughter to see the Jonas Brothers a couple of weeks ago….
40,000 screaming pre-teen girls…
By: BuddyO on August 22, 2008
at 2:23 pm
Buddy if there is any example for us that he’ll exists. That would be it.
By: brent(inWorship) on August 22, 2008
at 3:06 pm
LOL! You guys are too much.
By: Stephanie on August 22, 2008
at 3:15 pm
Hmm. Brent was that a Freudian typo? HE’LL exists?
Speaking of Freud, I’m still seeing that erect pinky.
By: Christian Beyer on August 22, 2008
at 3:22 pm
Brent, let me guess. You were typing on your iPhone. I do that all the time.
By: BuddyO on August 22, 2008
at 5:07 pm
Ding, Ding, Ding…
Buddy wins the prize
And C, that was my intent…
By: brent(inWorship) on August 22, 2008
at 5:40 pm
Chris-
Ok, so there……..I wrote.
By: Stephanie on August 22, 2008
at 6:20 pm
One of the causes of the Christian Right which has tended receive less attention than most is Neo-Prohibitionism. Most seem to believe that the principles of Prohibition are long dead because it was a paradigm which proved to be a failure at best, and probably counter-productive.
———————————–
pandreson
california dui
By: pandreson on September 12, 2008
at 11:03 pm