Posted by: Christian Beyer | August 21, 2008

Mothers Against Drunk Driving are Madd at Jesus

That’s right. It has been reported that Jesus of Nazareth, at a wedding in Cana, did knowingly and willfully provide alcoholic beverages to children UNDER THE AGE OF 21!!!!

As reported by the Jerusalem Examiner:

It was alleged that the bride herself was only around 13 or 14 years of age, and although the groom sported a full beard he wasn’t a day over 18. This did not deter Jesus and his mother Mary (listed as an accomplice) from providing double the amount of wine intended for the feast, which some say was a deliberate intent to encourage ‘binge’ drinking.

The Palestine chapter of MADD is asking that Jesus be brought up on charges but it is believed that the local Roman magistrate will dismiss the complaint as being a tad hysterical. No evidence can be found that Jesus actually purchased any wine near the time of the wedding.

Last week a 17 year old Judean boy was injured when his camel tossed him into the side of a date palm just two blocks from the site of the wedding. Centurions on the scene suspected that he had been drinking and he was given a breath test. Failing this (the camel fainted), he was ordered to gargle with lemon juice, vinegar and mint. His wife and four children suffered only minor injuries.

The instances of wine induced camel and donkey accidents among young people in the region around Jerusalem is said to be on the rise. New legislation is in the works to make it illegal for camels and donkeys to consume alcohol.

Seriously though. Recently a large group of university deans and presidents have asked that the legal drinking age be lowered, under the assumption that this will help reduce alcohol abuse on campus. Their arguments actually make a lot of sense.

But the only argument I need is this one: if you are old enough to get married, old enough to vote and old enough to die for your country then you are old enough to drink. I know 50 year olds who shouldn’t be allowed near a bottle of Bud – age does not always equate with maturity or the lack there of.

Europe, where they have cast aside much of the Puritanical baggage we are saddled with, doesn’t have this problem with teen alcohol abuse. They never made alcohol into a forbidden and hence, very attractive, taboo. Their coming of age parties are not hinged on getting ‘wasted’ because to the European kid it’s just another…food.

Anyway, Jesus did not seem to have a problem sharing a glass of wine with some young people. Not that it makes any difference to me. I was more than happy to allow my 19 year old daughter to enjoy a Mike’s Hard Lemonade or two on our family beach picnic the other day. Quite civilized, I would say, if not quite legal.


Responses

  1. Where in the world do you get these pictures Chris? Too funny.

    Oh and yeah, good post. I was just talking about this. I agree.

  2. I agree with you here. Age has nothing to do with it. Culture and environment speak a lot louder. I didn’t read through all the arguments for hanging the age, but I am not sure changing the age will help to hinder abuse on the college environment, but it most definitely will not add to it.

  3. Yeah, my nephew, a very upright, hardworking, proud and moral young man has had two incidents with alcohol abuse while away for his first year in college, ending up in the ER once. Being underage was irrelevant. His parents were VERY strict about the law concerning alcohol- he was never permitted to have a beer.

    I contrast this with my two kids. At meals, if we were having wine or beer then it was also offered to them, just as it is done in Europe. 99 times out of a hundred they had no interest – YECH! But we showed them that beer and wine and even other alcoholic drinks were a pleasant addition to life and intended to be enjoyed in moderation – just like the mashed potatoes on the table. Neither one of them have had any problems to date not that they won’t – one never knows – but you can either attempt to shelter them from ‘evils’ or introduce them to worldly customs in a mature way that will nip any ‘evil’ in the bud. Buddy touched on this with his post on taking his son to concerts.

    Imagine being told that you must have Pepsi with your Brats or lemonade with your pasta Putanesca because you are ‘only’ 18 (or 16 or even 12)

  4. Oh, and Brent. “Nice” avatar. Is that your pinkie being thrust so delicately into the air?

  5. Steph, Buddy O sent me that picture as a comment on my post about the Black Jesus. I just added the beer.

    When are going to write something new on your site?

  6. Sheesh. What’s next? Come ‘on, Chris. You Lamn Diberals! Always lowering moral standards.

    How about an on campus pub at YIT?

  7. Actually you will find that Libertarians, not liberals, are the most vocal voice calling for the elimination of drug and alcohol prohibitions, but more and more conservatives are jumping on it. Unfortunately it is considered political suicide to even suggest an open debate on the topic thanks to extremists like MADD.

    I hate to say this, sorry if it upsets anyone out there, but the zealots at MADD have all the qualities we associate with petty fascists. The only ones who might be more strident are the anti-tobacco fanatics. I can’t wait until the smoke haters take on Alcoholics Anonymous.

  8. I have to argue there… the La Leche League takes the cake… They are the pro-breastfeeding Nazis….

  9. WOW Christian, you missed the main point of another one! Your consistency is admirable……

  10. I don’t care how militant they get – I’m not doin’ it!

  11. Dan, using the story of the wedding feast was an attempt at satirizing those who would like to impose their moral views on the rest of us. I don’t really think that Jesus was out to create a drunken orgy, just as I don’t think that everyone who is opposed to prohibitions is out to encourage irresponsible behavior.

    I’ve got to applaud you on your consistency as well. ;)

  12. Chris-

    I will be writing something new within the year….I think. ;) Sometimes it just seems more fun to come hang out on your friends blogs. You aren’t nicely telling me to go away are you? LOL

    Your posts here are making me ponder a lot more than I would have imagined, so I’m certain I will be talking about something new very soon.

  13. Heck no, Steph. I love it when you come by. Anyway…within a YEAR! C’mon now.

  14. Dan (the man) said:

    WOW Christian, you missed the main point of another one! Your consistency is admirable……

    Does that mean secondary and tertiary points have no value? Or should we just hammer home the same ‘main points’ that we learned in Sunday School over and over again?

  15. Ever try decaf Dan? Maybe a Latte?

  16. Buddy is most definitely going to hell…or whatever equivalent we are discussing, for taking his son to a concert :)

    And yes, that is my pinky. I am proud of it.

  17. You know what they say about the size of a man’s pinky. I wouldn’t be too proud.

  18. I have fake pinkies. Prior to making that decision, men were always jealous of me. I thought the new ones would be best…

  19. Hell?? no my wife was already there… she took my daughter to see the Jonas Brothers a couple of weeks ago….

    40,000 screaming pre-teen girls…

  20. Buddy if there is any example for us that he’ll exists. That would be it.

  21. LOL! You guys are too much.

  22. Hmm. Brent was that a Freudian typo? HE’LL exists?

    Speaking of Freud, I’m still seeing that erect pinky.

  23. Brent, let me guess. You were typing on your iPhone. I do that all the time.

  24. Ding, Ding, Ding…

    Buddy wins the prize :)

    And C, that was my intent…

  25. Chris-

    Ok, so there……..I wrote. ;)

  26. One of the causes of the Christian Right which has tended receive less attention than most is Neo-Prohibitionism. Most seem to believe that the principles of Prohibition are long dead because it was a paradigm which proved to be a failure at best, and probably counter-productive.
    ———————————–
    pandreson
    california dui


Leave a response

Your response:

Categories