Posted by: Christian Beyer | July 18, 2007

The Black Jesus

9558black-jesus-and-scenes-of-life-posters.jpg

Today I visited a funeral parlor in downtown Baltimore. A few days ago one of my co-worker’s lost his 23 year old son in a drive-by shooting. This was just another tragedy in a fairly long litany of violence that has affected the people of the school where I work. Almost all of our students and many of my co-workers live in the inner city of Baltimore so there are very few of us that don’t know someone personally who has died by gunfire.

The viewing was in the afternoon and I took off a little early from work to pay my respects. Although we were not close, I liked and respected the father, who was still recuperating from a serious surgery. Having a son in his early twenties myself, I can easily imagine what he was going through. When I got to the funeral home I was directed to the chapel, where the body of the young man lay in an open casket. He was dressed in a formal business suit and his beard made him look older than his age. His picture, propped up by the registration book, showed a good looking and happy young man.

I did not know the particulars, but I knew that shootings like this were common in the city. People are always saying that you had to be insane to live downtown, you should move out, especially if you have kids. (What’s really insane are the outrageous real estate prices throughout Maryland, making that option nearly impossible for many of the city’s residents.)

My friend was not at the funeral, having gone home to catch some rest. I sat in a pew by myself, in the chapel, with about a dozen people that I had never met before. I assumed that most of them were family of the deceased. I was the only white person there. Feeling awkward ( I am terrible at meeting new people) I figured that this was as about as good a time as any to do some quiet praying. I thanked God that these people seemed to know Jesus because in my experience he was was able to help carry us through these sorts of trials.

I looked up above the boy’s casket and fixed my eyes on the statue of Jesus  hanging from the ceiling, without a cross and his  arms outstretched, as I have seen him posed in dozens of other churches. I was surprised to see that this time Jesus was a black man.

I’d heard of this little fringe controversy for some time now; Some people (almost always white) take exception to Jesus being portrayed as a dark skinned African. To them this was a type of historical revision that bordered upon the sacrilegious. It’s not so much a problem that he is portrayed as a black  that they find offensive; they wouldn’t be any happier if he was seen as a Chinaman, a Mexican or a Red Indian. They just feel that we should stick to church tradition – which means continuing to portray Jesus as a Northern European. He most certainly never is depicted with the Semitic features one would expect of a Palestinian Jew. In fact, I think most Christians have put it out of their minds that he really was a Jew.

classic-jesus.jpg

painting by Walter Sallman (1940)

So for years and perhaps centuries, Jesus’ face has been that of a handsome, light complected and blondish young man. My memories as a young Catholic are of all our statues and crucifixes in my home, school and church following this model. Over my bed, the peaceful and contented face of this man (who could easily have been one of my German ancestors) gazed solemnly down upon me every night as I said my prayers. (This painting, by Walter Sallman is posted on this page. Some of you may recognize it as well.)

Later, this inaccuracy took on absurd dimensions and we find Jesus portrayed on stage and screen by the likes of Jeffrey Hunter, Chris Sarandon, Ted Neely, William Defoe and Max von Sydow. Not a Semite (or Semite looking) face in the bunch.

So what’s the problem with Christians of African descent seeing the risen Jesus, who lives among them and within them, as being physically like them? Or for people of any ethnicity to find it easier to relate to Jesus the man if he is more sympathetic to their culture and their lives when portrayed as one of them. Certainly that is one lesson of the Gospels, that Jesus shares our joys and sufferings. I would think that it might be difficult for people who had been oppressed for years, either as slaves, or colonial subjects, to accept an icon that so closely resembles their oppressors.

There is the risk of making Christ into our own image, a risk that the church has run afoul of for centuries. We must never forget that Jesus the man was a Jew; living in a Jewish land, with Jewish family and friends, and practicing a Jewish religion. With that in mind, the African-American faith traditions have done a much better job of remembering the Jewishness of their black Jesus than the Caucasian-American church has done with their white one. Being the slaves and the oppressed of the dominant American culture for so long helped them identify closely with God’s chosen people, the perennial underdogs of history, the Israelites.

Artistically speaking, it is probably more accurate to portray Jesus as a black man rather than as what most Western  Christians have become accustomed.


Responses

  1. I once saw a picture from the catacombs of Rome, and Jesus was portrayed as having short hair and clean shaven. He looked like a combination of Middle-Eastern and Mediterranean
    –in other words like a person who would fit in unnoticed in a Jewish/Arab/Greek/Latin world.

  2. I like the way Donald Miller describes Jesus, he says that Christ probably looked like Osama bin Laden.

    I must say though, that anything but the white Jesus I am accustomed to strikes me as a little odd, although I am aware that he certainly looked different than I imagine. Not to mention that most of the pictures and other portrayals of Jesus show him as a very handsome man, but thats not how prophecies in Isaiah describe Him.

  3. Yeah, sometimes I will hear ‘experts’ talking about how Jesus must have been tall and strong and physically very attactive. Andrew Greely is even spewing some goofy stuff going about how sexually attractive he must have been (and still is) to most women, a ‘hunk’.

    Of course, when you look at the pictures of the black Jesus that I posted, they too have a definite ‘hunky’ aspect to them. The figure I saw in the funeral home was fully clothed and looked very ‘average’.

    (in fact, I think I will delete the one that looks like Mario van Peeples – if curious you can see it here; http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/pic/AGF/9554~Black-Jesus-Montage-Posters.jpg )

    Here’s another interesting artistic portrayel of the Lord. Boogie on down Jesus!

    http://www.polkadotmittens.com/journal/images/jesus.jpg

  4. Here’s some other good depictions of Jesus, equally valid.. no?

    http://www.milkshake-batatas.blogger.com.br/jesus%20south%20park.JPG

    http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/thumb/1/13/NegroJesus.jpg/290px-NegroJesus.jpg

    http://www.gamerevolution.com/images/misc/jesus_evil_dead.jpg

    http://www.classicalvalues.com/Asian-Jesus_sm.jpg

    http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/thumb/2/2a/Animejesus.jpg/180px-Animejesus.jpg

    http://claudia.weblog.com.pt/arquivo/Jesus%20In%20India.jpg

    http://cimarronline.homestead.com/files/buddy.jpg

    The fact is Jesus was a real person, with a real heritage and a real ethnicity. Jewish. To make him out to be black is just a silly as making him caucasion, or a surfer, or anime…

    He’s not some fictional character like Charlie Brown who can be adapted and depicted in what ever way makes folks feel good.

    We was Jewish which means he probably looked more like this:

    http://scienceblogs.com/bushwells/upload/2006/11/marty_feldman.jpg

    or this:

    http://www.paraethos.com/images/allen.jpg

  5. I guess my last comment got SPAMMED because I had too many link in it… Oh well.

    That seems very ‘intolorant’ of you Chris..? ;)

    Anyway here’s one for you…

  6. Hey, you stole that last one off my Christmas tree! Anyway, I de-spammed your comment (as all can see). Pretty funny. (Though I still don’t think a black Jesus icon is such a big deal. Better than Hali Salasi or Che Guevera.)

  7. Thanks for allowing me to post ;)

    I guess your right about the black Jesus icon… We should probably make a black George Washington, a black Plato, a black Ghandi and a black Martin Luther King Jr… Oh wait, scratch that last one…

  8. Now why would WE want to do that? (We meaning the WASPs that we are). I don’t even think people of color would want to do that. I never asked anyone at the time, but I’ll bet that the black people in that chapel do really think that Jesus was black. But the black icon probably helps to remind them that he definitely was not white.

  9. Hmm. Jesus like Woody Allen?

    John, do you love me–I mean really love me– mean not in a bad way; do any of us know what love means? Is it like the chicken at Greenburg’s Deli? Or more like the Corned Beef at Junior’s?

    I dunno

    Ambrosia

  10. “Now why would WE want to do that?”

    Well I wouldn’t, I was being sarcastic. I guess people would for the same reason they want to depict Jesus (a jew) as a black man (or white for that matter).

    Going back to MLK Jr, perhaps if I have a depiction of him as a White Anglo, then I could relate to his message better…. (again with the sarcasm)

    Woody Allen… Actually I like the Marty Feldman image better…. Any stereotypical jewish look would be closer than any caucasian or black image.

  11. More important that the skin color portrayed on statues and pictures, is the way we portray Christ in our everyday lives.

    When we exhibit Christ as the epitomy of love, then it is of little concern what color His skin was.

  12. That’s absolutley true Sista, I don’t think you’ll get any arguments here.

    This whole article and it’s responses are kind of whimsical and a goof.

    My point is that it’s silly (disrespectful) to take the most important figure in History and dress Him up to suit one’s fancy. Let’s realize who He really is. The context of Jesus being from Jewish descent has huge implications on how we view His life and teachings. They would have different meaning and impact if He were from Wales or Zimbabwe.

  13. Right on, Sista. In spite of Buddy’s reaction to the article, I really wan’t trying to be whimsical. And I am certainly not concerned about the pigmant nor the historical accuracy of statues and pictures.

    What I was trying to say was in essence just this; Why should I (or anyone) really CARE if someone wants to see Jesus as black, white, red, yellow or green (for the Vulcans out there). It’s great that they are engaged with Christ in some fashion, even if it is dissimilar to mine in some ways.

    What should be important to me is not what is in their hearts, but what is in mine. If Christ truly owns my heart then I will not be resentful or offended by the actions of others and instead see and celebrate the good that is there.

    As you said, it is all about love.

  14. Ahhhh…. I just wan’t to pick poseys and dance through a lush green field….

  15. C’mon, Warhammer, you’re being insensitive again. (Sniff!)

    Actually, for those of you who don’t know Buddy, here’s a link to a photo I took of him at a picnic last year when he thought no one was looking. He sure does love those posies….

    http://www.hickerphoto.com/data/media/166/cute_grizzly_bear_sc12.jpg

  16. Oh, and I found another one. I think this picture really shows how much practice has gone into his passion:

    http://www.shuntevents.freeuk.com/images/dancing-bear.gif

  17. (I think Jeanette left this response on a different post by mistake)

    I am comforted that you chose to pay respect to the family. All to often our discomfort outweigh the loving response we want to make.

    There continues to be the debate about what Jesus looked like. I’ve always thought that is the one area Christians are unwilling to explore. It would shatter much of the church’s tradition and put many religious publishers out of business.

    Jeanette Vaughn

  18. Yeah, Jeanette… right. Convenient how complimentarty she is…..

    BTW for all you who have been fooled by Chris’ sappy exterior. Here’s some viedo footage I video taped of him on an evangelism mission in Ellicott City last year.

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=zM_aZaBqUZo

  19. Now you’re gettin’ way too silly. Besides…they were zombies.

    BTW, why are you busing Jeanette? You know her? She obviously is much more perceptive than some people.

  20. You started it with the Bear… At least I picked a video which used your theme song as the background… ;)

    I was insinuating that the Jeantte post was really just you stacking the comments… Bad joke, sorry.

    (sorry Jeanette whover you are…)

  21. Hey, I’ll take a nice word whenever I can get one.

  22. Well, I venture to inject this , if his color dont matter , when then is He always white?
    Why not always black ? Know why ?! ‘Cause it does matter, thats why ! Ever see a black likeness of Jashua in a caucazoid’s house>you wont either – ’cause images in effect ministers to the mind/psychi- thats why you see white images of HIM in black folks huts….Sure its a subtle thing but ever so powerful

  23. Why not always black? Probably because he was not black. The question is, why is he usually portrayed as ‘white’ man with northern European roots? You are right, it is a subtle yet powerful suggestion. At times to be able to identify racially with an icon of Christ may help relationally. But it also may be divisive.

    I found this picture comparison interesting, with the left (Jeffrey Hunter) and center (Ziggy Marley?) images presenting two grossly innaccurate representations of Jesus, while the right image is probably more ethnically accurate.

    http://www.wehaitians.com/jesus_1.jpg

  24. *Gulp*

    I agree…

    One argument I heard for protraying Christ in any race other the middle eastern extraction was that the gospel is for everybody. Which I find a little convincing.

    However, I also think you are right to say that Jesus was a Jew, which obviously relates to his fulfillment of all righteousness, and to portray it differently than that is to domesticate him through his image and to make the incarnation a racial issue

    I once heard Tim Keller say that if we saw a picture of Jesus and the apostles, we would have no idea which one he was. I actually like thinking of of him as a little simp of a Jew, totally unassuming and impressing no one when he entered the room.

    Max Von Sydow. That is really amusing. I am thinking “Strange Brew”.

  25. [...] wrote an interesting post today on Comment on The Black Jesus by JasonHere’s a quick [...]

  26. because is a jew How does that make him not black?

  27. Well, as a first century Palestinian Jew the odds would be very much against this. And of course the authors of the Gospels go to great lengths to take his lineage back to David and even Abraham and Adam (not that I think this is an accurate ancestral record per se) But I think it is pretty safe to assume that Jesus was a Semite.

  28. Nice topic – understand the idea being expressed, pointing out common ‘error’ some christians tend to make or merely ‘forget’.

    Can i toss a big hungry cat in amongst some pigeons?

    Exodus 20:4

    Just how many statues of a man on a cross do we have do you reckon???

    What amount of similarity is there in the Jesus we build in our heart and mind and the REAL one?
    Anywhere near as much as we believe there to be??

  29. Yeah, that’s a good point, one that the Witnesses have been hammering for some time, ergo their refusal to identify with the image of the cross. And you won’t find many statues in most protestant churches. But of course there are plenty of less obvious idols being worshiped in all churches.

    I think the most important similarity should be one of the heart. In that regards it must be important for many people to see God as Jesus, a man, human like ourselves. God must have considered this to be important as well. So how we envision Jesus does play into this. Are the physical and racial distinctions important? When we encounter Christ with our heads, trying to understand his ministry as that of a 1st century Jewish mystic in Roman occupied Palestine it would seem to be very important. When we try to take his character upon ourselves, in our hearts, then how he ‘looked’ should only matter to the individual relating to him as God. I don’t think any of us should be worried about whether some see Jesus as European, Asian or Eskimo, as long as that visualization is not being used to counter his message.

  30. I think it is natural for humans to identify more closely with Jesus when we believe Him to be ‘one of Us’!

    I think also Jesus tried hard to make it clear that he didn’t want that – he didn’t want to be a part of YOUR family – He wanted YOU to be a part of His. ‘I come to set brother against brother’ etc. Presumably for the reasons many of us can see that cause division and hatred amongst Man and his Fellow Christian’s ( eg Ireland, US civil war etc) and His fellow Muslims, Jews, Hindu’s, Blacks. Asians, etc..

    Our skin, our religions are the ‘clothes’ we wear. When we look into our hearts and the hearts of others we all wear ‘white’ – or slightly ’soiled’ grey versions of it at least ;-)

    Seems like, on this, you and me are singing from the same page of the songbook?

    Fancy That! :-)

  31. When I personally envision Christ, when I am reading the Gospel accounts, I never ’see’ his face. Sort of like one of those movies that deliberately avoids focusing the camera upon the subject himself. I vaguely remember a film that had Jesus in a cameo role that did just this. Ben Hur, maybe?

  32. Interesting post Christian.

    I read something recently that said that one of the earliest images of Christ known showed him as being cleanshaven (concurs with what Ambrosia says). I’m of the opinion does it matter what the colour of his skin was? I’m not trying to be PC here either. I just don’t believe it really matters. Why do people insist on focusing on such superficial crap. They should be focusing on his words, his message, what he was trying to teach us.

  33. I agree, evangelines.

    Part of what needs to be included is that his message was related to who The 2nd person of the Trinity chose to become, a Jew. What he did and who he is speaks to all, but through a context which he chose.

    I heard Tim Keller say once something to the effect of “Jesus was somebody. The context of his incarnation cannot be spearated from what he said.” Which, I think, doesn’t at all act as a corrective to what you said. I totally agree with the sum of what you said.

  34. As a racially blended family, we talk about this all the time. I didn’t realize you were also an inner-city dweller! and you’re right~I get VERY frustrated with the judgement from others~*especially* Christians. What’s the difference in our blooming where we are planted and a missionary suffering danger in a foreign land?

    Ah well. (((((HUGS))))) sandi

  35. I like that analogy. Gotta tell you that I don’t live in the city – I’m a bland suburbanite. I work with kids from the inner city – my school is on the city border.

    Thanks, Sandi.

  36. It is said, that at one time, the Catholic Church would use whatever methods of control, mainly in the form of religion, to maintain supremacy. One strong example of that are the “non-canonical” books of the Apocrypha. I also believe that the Northern European Image of Jesus is such another form of control. When religion ruled, it ruled with a strong discriminating arm. Religion also set the tone and justification for slavery. In my uneducated and humble opinion, it seems, the European image gave validation to an ideology of control. The question is who was being controlled and who was controlling?

  37. The gospel say it doesn’t matter what color of skin Jesus was the only thing that matters is what he did for us

  38. This was an eloquently written piece. Thank you for sharing it with the world :-)

  39. Hey, I just surrendered my life to God this weekend and it felt great. I deleted all of the explicit stuff off of my iPod, and I am now replacing it with Christian worship music (metal.) I just love the new me! Oh and i wrote a beautiful poem off the top of my head. I’ll see when i can get it on here. maybe tomorrow. I’m not sure.

  40. Courtney, congratulations. Just don’t get rid of all of your old music. Trust me on this.

  41. My comment
    The white man didn’t mean any harm when they tried changing the face of jesus to a white person. Every time they entered any country out of the united states all they seen was beautiful black Kings and Queens. They know they aint worth shit so they tried to put there self infront of everything. As the world could see the “white race” is the slowest race it has been over 400.000 years that they stole our life and tried to keep us down. and from nothing we has risen and has passed thier race. the only race they win is the one they CHEAT. what;s great about today? they are being caught look at the jails the blacks are being let out because they were FRAMED cheated in the first place the CHEATER who calls himself the PROSECUTOR. After 10 years of college he still couldn’t win, he didn’t want the black to win so he cheated and rely on the old trickery word THERE IS NO EXCUSE TO IGNORENCE OF THE LAW. in short to bad I lied and the judge is white too he is going to help the lying PROSECUTOR. in short the white man can’t think they are born followers. and a follower stands back and look and as always stab you in the back. So don’t blam the regular white man for cheating blame his ancestors for being lazy and lier’s. the jail is full and it’s getting worse. look on wall street. 29 a day get arrested. look at base ball they want to be strong as blacks. 30 a day getting busted CLEMEN wants to be the great white host so bad he is STANDING IN FRONT OF CONGRESS LIEING!!! look in the white history book. they don’t have any. So don’t blame today white men for being sneaky it was inherit from his ancestors ‘NEPOLAND,CHRISTAPHER COLUMBUS. AND THE LIST GOES. THEY DID,T KNOW THIS SAYING you can run but you sure can’t hide. some people say’white school don’t let blacks in” They don’t understand they can’t let Blacks in because they are being taught to cheat blacks.

  42. Bwaaahhhaaaaa!!

    Chris your a hoot… did you write this as some kind of satire??

    I almost busted a gut at this line:

    “THERE IS NO EXCUSE TO IGNORENCE OF THE LAW”

    I snorted water out of my nose laughing so hard…

  43. Nope, didin’t write that. Serena did. No offense,
    Serena (if there is a ‘Serena’) but at first I thought this was some sort of spam and I am still not sure it isn’t. But nevertheless….inside your angry diatribe I can see a kernel of truth. Just trying to figure out what you are really trying to say.

  44. YES A BLACK JESUS HAHA

  45. ssss

  46. [...] 9, 2008 by Christian The most popular post I have ever written is “The Black Jesus”“. On a daily basis I get over 10 times as many hits for that piece than any other. I have no [...]

  47. Jesus Christs tells us to love our enemies, forgive them, turn the other cheek, give them our cloak and coat; give away our personal belongings and follow Him. Have you done this?
    Do you know any alleged Christians that have ?

    Nietzsche said, “The last Christian died on the cross.”

    One cannot love your neighbors and segregate them. Therefore. Multi-cukturalism is a prerequisite to being Christian. It is for that reason the POPE advocates open borders with Mexico. The word CATHOLIC means “UNIVERSAL” The Churdh ALWAYS has sought a united World under CHRIST. The ILLUMINATI too seeks One World Government – which may be why Henry Kissinger, ZIONIST, visits the Vatican so frequently.

    James von Brunn-88

    • And now sir, you are dead. That should sell some artwork.

    • And now, three months after this post the true face of James von Brunn is revealed… not that it was ever concealed by much…
      He guns down two security guards at the Holocaust Museum, consumed by his hatred and mental illness, killing one. A man he never knew. For nothing.
      It’s so sad its almost hard to hate him.

      • I didn’t understand your comment (or a couple of others that I got). I didn’t hear about what this fellow did today. My God.

  48. Ladies and gentlemen, I give you James von Brunn; decorated war veteran, accomplished artist, social activist, anti-Semite, white supremacist and fellow Marylander.

    It is always nice when someone demonstrates that I am not imagining people such as yourself. Thank you, sir.

  49. If jesus was in any way of non jewish it will prove that he was a froud and not the real deal. Then why jewish you might ask? God made a promise to abraham that he will be the father of many. Jesus is that promise through him we become children of abraham in earth and children of God through Christ in heaven. This black n white debate is nonsence im very sad if you see Christ for color of skin. I know Farakkhan would love to see Jesus black because of his deep hatred towards whites and jews. If you feel that way then there never be room for the real Christ in your life.

  50. Jesus certainly was Jewish. To insist that he was actually a Negro is deluded and probably political, if not outright racist. Just as the church did when they denied (and some still deny) his Jewishness and prefer to see him as European.

    But that wasn’t really my point. Jesus meets us where we are, no matter who we are.

    Welcome, prguy. Hope you come on back.

  51. Gee – I’d almost forgotten what prejudice looked like! :-) Nice to have reminders now and then :-)

    God Bless America!

    love <3

  52. * i meant of course, almost forgotten what OTHER people’s prejudice looked like ;-)

    Mine stares me in the face daily :-)

    love <3

  53. Thanks for the qualification, Love. I was afraid I was going to have to rap your knuckles. ;)

    John Shore, over on Suddenly Christian, has two neat conversations going on that relate to this topic. You can join in HERE and HERE.

  54. God is made in the image of people. Jesus is supposed to look like us. How does Jesus look like then…well no one knows. For all that matter how do we even know he is man? What if Jesus was a woman? Then what? Either way we could ponder on this topic for ever and we wouldn’t go any father. The only way we will ever find out is when we go to heaven. Then we will see God for ourselves.

    We can imagine Jesus looks like us. That way we can connect to God and be closer to God. I think that us not knowing how Jesus looks like we can focus on what God is telling us. That way we won’t judge Jesus on how Jesus looks.

  55. Are you making fun of Jesus? Would you mind removing the bottom 2 links… it really disturbs me.. thanks…

  56. No, alWYN, not at all. Perhaps making fun of ourselves.

    I got rid of those links – it was something to do with the settings in WordPress. I didn’t put them there at all. Settings changed.

  57. A church member wanted us to hang a picture of Jesus and I wanted to know which Jesus? baby Jesus? boy Jesus? cosmic Jesus? healing, angry, teaching, laughing, praying, dying, rising Jesus? prophetic Jesus? hanging out with sinners, priests, foreigners, suspicious folk? what color, gender, age? Which picture of Jesus do you want?

    As a pastor with a Jewish spouse, I thought I’d share that I use images of Jesus in worship from many different cultures and traditions. Sojourners or The Other Side mag had a great image of Jesus as HIV patient several years ago on its cover. I use images from many perspectives as a way of avoiding the idolatry of using only one kind of image. I also use global images because, if we are created imago dei, then we are blessed when we can recognize the face of G-d in our sisters and brothers. Sometimes though we need to be reminded that each other person is also created imago dei.

    When I used a remarkable painting from the Harlem Renaissance on Christmas Eve depicting an older Black man in clean shirt and overalls sitting in a small kitchen next to a woodstove with a babe in his lap — it was a revelation for me about being born in simple places, about Joseph’s willingness and faithfulness as a parent, about where I might notice the Holy being revealed, being born in the world today. I am very well aware that Jesus was a Jew (let me tell ya’, it was a weird moment when I was dating Simon to realized that Jesus probably looked more like him than blonde/blue eyed paintings I’d seen). That said, artists who use cultural cues to reveal something deeper, truer about the G-d who loves us and became one of us are following in the best traditions of Jesus who taught in parables — using metaphors to teach us more.

    A side comment — I do not use images that depict the first person of the trinity. Sorry Michelangelo, graven images ya know…

  58. Very interesting perspective, Susan. A couple of things you said stood out for me;

    Which Jesus do we want to visualize? And the idea that as metaphors what do these images convey? If we are so serious about making Jesus look ‘right’ or ‘authentic’ physically, rather than how he relates to people personally (which would require a fair amount of artistic license) then aren’t we now dipping into the area of graven images? I think that the image and the name of Jesus (with the cross and the Bible as well) have become just that for many people. They have taken on a ‘magical’ charm-like quality.

  59. Interesting point Christian.

    I can’t help but think that a lot of this has to do with the realist rennaisance artistic effect on Church images. By attempting to make Jesus look realistic, they detract from the Church’s focus, which is a transcendental spiritual reality – it is this spiritual beauty, not the natural, which was the focus of icons in the early Church (and continues in the Orthodox Church). Thus, for example, all the saints in the images have very weird looking sensory organs – to demonstrate the spiritual reality that the person, body and soul, is sanctified in Christ, and that their noses, ears, etc. are no longer the fallen ones which we are accustomed to see.

    In any case, none of the nationalities should be the criteria for how to make a realistic image of Jesus, since it says very clearly in scripture that his body was different after the resurrection.

  60. Good point and interesting information. And since we should not be intent on presenting the ‘correct’ criteria in our own representations of the physical Christ we should not be concerned about the representations of others, be they black, Asian or Native American.

    That being said, some consideration might be in order in regards to a particular representation when it’s ethnic characteristics are those of the ‘powers that be’. I think that there is something very questionable about missionaries working in Africa or Asia extolling the ‘virtues’ of European Christianity.

    The flip side is that of oppressed peoples desperately trying to see God in a different light than how their oppressors present him. African slaves and their descendants might find the idea of a ‘white’ Jesus as repugnant. Indians who have been colonized by Europeans may feel the same way. Theologically correct? Perhaps not, but if theology has no relevance to daily existence then it is…irrelevant and should be discarded. I would also suggest that it is Biblical in that Jesus held up the oppressed and not the powerful as being blessed.

  61. Doesnt matter what he looks like, your either living for him or going to hell, get off the race card and move on, it divides the country and now i realize people will burn in hell because Jesus is portrayed as white so some people wont accept him. Read the bible, live by it, and youll see him one day. Focus on this crap and youll end up in hell end of story

  62. [...] In “The Church Enslaved” by Tony Campolo and Michael Battle, the story is told of a time when Campolo was teaching a Bible study for African-American teen agers. When he entered the classroom he was upset to find that the portrait of Jesus on the wall (the very same one shown here) had been replaced by a picture of a black Jesus. [...]

  63. Have none of you ever imagined that the traditional images of Jesus were intended to portray who and what the Messiah may appear to be when he comes back as a Lion, instead of a Lamb, as Revelations states?

    The actual Jesus of Nazareth is said to have not been much to look at. Do you not believe that, as God’s son, the incarnate Christ, Jesus the lamb probably did not look like he does in any of our pictures today?

    I have faith that God would portray Jesus as he would appear to us in the end, so as to remove any sort of doubt as to whether or not this man is the messiah, as he says he is.

    Some of you have said that he is a “hunk” and captures the hearts of women. This could not have been so of Jesus the lamb. I believe that the Christ Revelations refers to is the one we so often see masculine images of.

    By the way… Jesus was no woman. Jesus is and was a masculine name. Furthermore, I understand that in today’s society, women want their share of equal rights, and that is just fine. But the fact is, that back then, a woman could not have traveled around with a group of twelve men, in the wilderness, and could not have done the majority of the things he did if he were a woman in that time period.

    Also, perhaps Jesus is a combination of all races. Recall when God divided the people of the earth and sent them scattered like lost sheep, speaking chaotically in different languages and tongues? Would it not be fitting for him to share equally in all of our ethnicities, resulting in a union of all people once more?

  64. Thank, Stephen. And welcome.

    I’m not sure that I understand everything you are saying here.

    All the depictions I have seen of Jesus have been masculine, although many of them seem to be enhancing (forgive me) his “feminine” qualities of mercy and nurturing – holding children, shepherding sheep, weeping etc etc.

    Very few of these images would suggest the Christ portrayed in Revelations. I have seen those as well: on war charger, sword in hand, angry expressions. But they almost seem to be of a different person.

    That being said, they are almost exclusively white men with northern European features.

    I like your suggestion that perhaps is a combination of all races (I don’t know if you mean that figuratively or not). I remember a cover of Time magazine where they presented a computer generated picture of a young woman with ‘homogenized’ ethnicity. It was nearly impossible to determine what race she was but it was obvious what races she was not.

    http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,19931118,00.html

  65. d(Typos corrected .. apologies)

    Good writing, carefully considered and heartfelt.

    Jesus, however, was not just a Jew but almost certainly a mixed breed result of his Jewish mother and a Roman soldier, the rape having been the source of the need to create a divine birth to save her life and world and family from shame. It was a heavy burden for the young Jesus to bear, but he did, playing his role perfectly.

    Except that he refused revenge and violence as would befit a suitable God-son. From some spiritual place only the ages can ever know, he found a spirit within him that forgave enemies, that healed through love, and that gave peace through understanding.

    Is it wrong to portray Jesus as black, Hispanic, or Asian? Of course not. If some people see it as sacreligious, well, is that surprising? Those who stick firmly to human-defined rules of religion, be they Christian, Muslim, Jew, Buddhist, or even Atheist (a religion in its own right) — will always find things to oppose because by their nature they are orthodox and rigid. So nothing interesting in that observation really.

    If solace and peace can be found by depicting Jesus as something other than a half-Roman, half-Jewish man, then by all means they should do so and God surely will applaud. But if true biological accuracy is your goal, let us not talk of a “Palestinian Jew” who looks nothing like a European. Perhaps you are right — not a “northern” European. But a European? Yes, the Jesus of real life was almost certainly 50% Italian, and no doubt singularly handsome and charismatic to have led so many without lifting a finger in anger.

    Good piece of writing.

    - Dan

  66. Thanks, Dan.

    This idea of Mary being raped by a Roman soldier. This is the first time I’ve ever heard of this. Can you tell us where this came from?

  67. Oh, I’ve heard of that…..

    I think Jesus was portrayed by a cute little chipmunk with red shorts and the Roman Soldier was a big scary talking bear… Mary was a beautiful little mouse with big eyelashes… cute movie.

  68. OK, I Googled it. Apparently the director Paul Verhoeven has written a book that makes this claim. The claim goes as far back as the 1st or 2nd century. Verhoeven is a member of the Jesus Seminars but apparently his version of events is not widely held.

    According to CNN:

    “John Dominic Crossan a Jesus Seminar founder agreed. He said that while Verhoeven was a member in good standing, there was little evidence for the view that Jesus was illegitimate.

    Crossan said the claim was first reported in a polemic written in the second century against the Book of Matthew, intended for a Jewish audience.

    “It’s an obvious first retort to claims that Mary was a virgin,” Crossan said. “If you wanted to do a hatchet job on Jesus’ reputation, this would be the way.

    The most likely scenario for people who don’t accept that Jesus was literally the son of God and had no human father is simply that he was the son of Joseph, Crossan said.

    Verhoeven is not Walt Disney but he does make his living producing fantasies.

  69. Personally, I think the pictures are well lighted & colored. They are soft and tranquil, true, but thier cultural accuracy IS lacking. As an accredited Christian artist, I would like to respond by simply saying that Christ was Hebrew (which means He wouold’ve had dark brown hair & olive brown colored skin). Secondly, scripture goes on to say that He was ‘a plain man’-not handsome or strong-just as every other man would’ve looked back then. I just think more artists need to consider His cultural heritage and complextion before they paint.

  70. This discussion reminds me of an episode of Babylon 5 wherein
    the Vorlon Kosh must leave his environment suit to rescue Capt. Sheridan, he is seen simultaneously as the “Saviour” of the Narn, Minbari, human and presumably Drazi – as well as others by those respective races.

  71. All this fuss about what Jesus looked like. That is not important at all. What’s important is what did he say. The Gospel is not a gospel of drama or pictures, it’s a Gospel of Words; God’s Words. The Gospel of John says that the Word became flesh and dwelt among us. It’s just like the Devil to get us all hung up on “What did He look like” If you put on the whole armor of God, you’ll look just like Jesus to the Devil and that’s what’s most important. What did Jesus look like? Anointed!!!!

  72. Chris, you are right. It’s not important what he looked like, so if others seem him in a way that is physically different than I do, if the helps them to grasp the Gospel, well then so be it.

    But, what does ‘anointed’ look like?

  73. The annointed looks like me a multicultural brown skinned individual I came in a form that no man could boast I was like no other that is why i was hated, because they could not accept the fact of my skin color and saying I was GOD’s Son because I was the spirit that became flesh. I am now a Archangel fighting for the People I love. I have hair of lamb wool, my skin is brown, and my eyes brown. I am Alpha and Omega. Which is the light and the dark.

  74. In order to picture Jesus in your mind you have to remember that it was 2000 years ago, plus the vague description in the bible. Todays Jews or Palestinians don’t look like they did 2000 years ago.

  75. Joseph is I think right. To understand the bible better, one has to virtually teleport oneself to the time of Jesus. To see the people and culture of the time. Visualize them in the eye of the man talking at the others of his time. He was not talking to 21st century man. And since bible was written in modern times, the culture and mindset of people writing and interpretting them have to be considered as well.

  76. Christianity was brought by the Spaniards to the Philippines some 487 years ago. Church and State then entwined, armada and Church came together. Yes they brought with them a black Nazarene, the most famous of it, considered antique, is now the one enshrined in Quiapo Church, Metro Manila. I believe the black Nazarene was mainly [Roman Catholic- Spanish] politics – a dark colored Jesus in case they came on shores of dark colored people and a white Jesus just in case people were whites.

    As a boy during the 60s I used to hang around church, our house being only two houses away, and the stay-in church hands happened to be friends. Spaniards were gone. [“Filipinos” used to be one racist, aristocratic, discriminatory term applied to Island-born Spaniards to include Meztisos or mix blood, as distinct from European Spaniards. Browns were then called Indios. Today the term Filipinos applies to every one of the Philippines]

    In modern day, Churches in town and in half of the province were run by Colomban missionaries of the Roman Catholic Church. I remember Cabanagh, O’connor, Hurley, O’brian, Gorh, Dohan – mostly Irish, some of them too old but still alive today.

    Looking back at time, all the statues in churches there (I’m sure they’re still there) of Christ and the 12 apostles were mostly of European Caucasian profile. This is unrealistic as Christ and all were Mid-Eastern Mediterranean. I suppose Christ looked like any of them pureblooded Jews today except in his time there were no Gillette blade and handy hair scissors.

    I think, Black Nazarene was church-state politics in the era of White man’s colonization particularly by Spain. Today it looks like Black Nazarene is no more than part of Christian tradition.

    Other than that [except for the profiles] the original black Nazarene could be innocent Art. Employing the most durable wood belonging to the family of ironwoods [ they could be tough carving] like Kamagong. They can lie on the ground for centuries without rotting or eaten by termites. They are mostly, naturally, burnt in color.

  77. Thanks, rltj. Interesting stuff. I had not thought of that; the idea that an ethnic icon of Christ could be used to influence native populations. In that case the intent might be exactly the opposite although the result might be the same. The non-European believers may come to identify with non-European icon but the colonizers were not suggesting this for any liberating means.

  78. Thanks rltj, what you say is interesting and it presupposes what the originators of the famous paintings of Jesus where thinking. Like modern Christians they were creating Jesus in their own image. In my opinion.

  79. Joseph, I think you are absolutely correct. But I don’t see a terrible problem Africans seeing Jesus as Africa, or Asians seeing him as Asians or even Europeans seeing him as European as long as they get the message and the sacrifice. The problem is when we see Jesus as supporting our causes when they are power driven or selfish, or imperialistic or domineering. And that is really where so many people have co-opted his image.

  80. Amen Christian Beyer, it’s all about His TEACHINGS.

  81. Chris, I agree, icons are sort of technical. I would like to look at religion in the past as free of politics but evidences of politics and religion cannot be ignored.

    Philippine revolution was basically rebellion against Church and necessarily became rebellion against State. Church used to be not only entwined with politics, it was also heavily entwined with economics. Church was viewed as taller than State. There were movements against racial discrimination within the church itself. And, three Filipino priests [Gomez, Burgos and Zamora] were garroted to death in public for that. [Reminds me of Christ and the Pharisees]

    The Philippine national hero Dr. Jose Rizal [1861–1896], was also executed by public musketry for his criticisms against the Spanish Friars. He was never with the idea of overthrowing the State. He spent some time with other Filipinos in Europe lobbying for their cause [that was ended by others in rebellion.] Born Roman Catholic he converted to Mormon one time he went to Cuba.

    Around the time that the Philippine revolution started in 1896 another Catholic priest named Aglipay also split from the Church. Aglipayan [Iglesia Filipina Independiente], established in 1902, used to be the “official” religion of the revolutionaries. Today they are a very minor sect.

    Philippine revolution was cut by the Spanish – American war that ushered the Americans in the Philippines in 1898, which also opened the way for all Protestant Churches into the country.

    I failed to mention that the second largest denomination in the Philippines next to the Roman Catholic Church today is the Iglesia Ni Kristo [Church of Christ]. This is a Christian sect that had officially split from the Roman Catholic Church in 1914.

    INK has altered Catholicism. They believe in Christ as man, mortal, sort of living with the Holy Spirit. That everyone in God has right to call himself son of God. [That’s about Father, Son, Holy Ghost] I’ve not been in there so I cannot imagine how they have streamlined the whole bible, like the birth by a virgin, to that thesis. But, judging by their size, they must be doing well. They had done away with icons and statues that they have declared is idolatrous practice.

    Anyway, about Icons and religious statues, I think they are technical. They may have served their purpose, or maybe they still do. But some people today appear to be doing without any visual image of God in their mind.

  82. Well, I don’t know if I entertain any visual images in my mind or not when it comes to ’seeing’ God. At one point I only saw God as Jesus, in fact visualizing Jesus made it easier for me to conceptualize God and relate to him. But I eventually realized that I was only visualizing movie and picture book images of Jesus, images that were usually not very historic. Rather than correct that image I don’t think that I employ any picture at all.

  83. Message for “BUDDY O” Jesus was not a “White” man as posted on so many walls, in homes. I really do believe people like you are afraid of anything that has to do with the people of Africa… Why is that I wonder ? Just like so many others, you have bought into a myth that the Caucasian man is superior, so your identification with the blond haired blue eyed picture is all that you have to hold onto. You have been taught to believe that Africans are savages. This thought has been proven to be false. Europeans learned to be “civilized” from the Egyptians ( Khemet ) who where also infused with Nubians ( all in Africa ) the best Doctors in the world learned in Khemet. The beginings of religous study started where????? ( the “Graden of Eden” )Africa. Seems like there are a lot of you running around. Quoting what you have been taught, and not fact. Bones in Africa discovered from over a million years ago proves what you have been taught to be false. Studies in genetics have gone as far back to discover the original “Eve” where you might want to know???? in Africa. So if the original “Woman” was African that would mean that you and everyone else ( Jesus included ) to be what ??? African… Everheard of the original “Seven Sisters” ? Please do the universe a favor and instead of showing the ignorance that you have been taught…Please research and check your facts. You have been hoodwinked. Fact don’t worry about what “Jesus” looks like, I’m sure the “Creator” isn’t thinking of all the emtpy space that is rattling around in your head with these ideas. S/he comes in so many forms. Abandon the self and grow from within. Learn who and what the creator is and your place in the universe. Does all of that stuff you mentioned really matter??? if so … it’s like a security blanket “you and so many others need to cloak themselves in”. I feel for you and your spirit.

  84. Hey, Omo. Welcome.

    Though I’m not sure why you singled Buddy out for your criticisms. And I think you make some assumptions about what he knows and does not know that are more than a bit off the mark. All his kidding aside, I think Buddy’s main point is that if we forget the Jewishness of Jesus we miss much of what his Gospel had to say. I happen to agree with that wholeheartedly. Of course, that is precisely what happens when we portray Jesus as black, Asian or, more commonly, as a white European.

    That being said, on a personal, intimate and spiritual level, however we envision Jesus will likely be uniquely suited to how we need to be assured that he understands and loves us.

  85. Farther up this thread, on March 11th 2008, you will see a comment by James Von Brunn, the man who shot two security guards in the Holocaust Museum today before being shot himself.

    There are lots of really sick, hateful and violent people out there. It is chilling when one of them crosses your path, even though it is only a ‘virtual’ path.

  86. [...] The Invevitable Result of Racism The most popular post I’ve ever written has been “The Black Jesus”.  I don’t think it’s because it’s particularly  well written or even that [...]

  87. Jesus….IS WHITE. But Yahsuoa is –possibly–black or man of color. Which actually would be considered black living in this society today.

    When god walked the earth, he dwell in the regions that were people of color. I DO NOT have nor will I ever have a white face picture of Jesus hanging in my living room or anywhere else in my house for that matter. He’s just a white man on a picture/painting. No one knows how God looks. But of course in the bible it said his hair is like sheep wool (kinky). His eyes are like fire. And his feet are like brass as if they were burnt in the fire. Now if you burn brass in the fire it surely would not come out white. There are so meny books in the bible that were taking out by Europeans and put what they want in there. Thanks to the original barbaric savages they scrude up religion and-amoung others things-really bad. Now people don’t know what to believe.


Leave a response

Your response:

Categories